Improve command palette navigation #3174
Conversation
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:
You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. |
WalkthroughThis update refactors the command palette and its related components to decentralize data fetching, enhance error handling, and improve user feedback. Components like QuickActions, BoardNavigation, and AddTaskForm now manage their own data and UI states, feature collapsible sections, and provide explicit error and empty-state handling. A new error boundary encapsulates the command palette for robust runtime error recovery. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CommandPalette
participant ErrorBoundary
participant QuickActions
participant BoardNavigation
participant AddTaskForm
User->>CommandPalette: Open command palette
CommandPalette->>ErrorBoundary: Render children
ErrorBoundary->>QuickActions: Render (fetches nothing, uses wsId)
ErrorBoundary->>BoardNavigation: Render (fetches boards with wsId)
ErrorBoundary->>AddTaskForm: Render (fetches boards/lists/tasks)
QuickActions-->>User: Show quick action items (collapsible)
BoardNavigation-->>User: Show boards (collapsible, fetch state)
AddTaskForm-->>User: Show add task form (fetch state)
ErrorBoundary-->>User: On error, show error UI with retry/reload
User->>ErrorBoundary: Retry or reload if error occurs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Adinorio, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request delivers a substantial upgrade to the task management system, focusing on improving the user's ability to navigate, filter, and analyze tasks. It introduces powerful new UI features for task lists and analytics, backed by significant database enhancements for tag management, all while refining the command palette's usability and error handling.
Highlights
- Enhanced Task List View: The task list view has been significantly upgraded with advanced filtering capabilities (by priority, status, assignee, and date), multi-column sorting, pagination, and options to toggle column visibility. It also introduces bulk task selection for future actions.
- New Task Analytics & Visualization: Several new components have been added to provide deeper insights into tasks, including a comprehensive Gantt chart timeline, detailed status distribution, task creation and flow analytics, and workflow efficiency metrics.
- Improved Command Palette User Experience: The command palette now offers a more robust user experience with explicit loading indicators, detailed error messages, and user-friendly empty states. It includes retry mechanisms for data fetching and direct prompts to create new boards or lists when applicable.
- Database Performance & Integrity for Tags: The backend has been strengthened with new PostgreSQL GIN indexes for faster JSONB tag queries on board tags. Atomic operations for adding and removing tags, along with a new database-level
CHECKconstraint, ensure data integrity and improve concurrency.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This is an impressive pull request that significantly enhances the application's task management capabilities. The new list view with advanced filtering, sorting, and bulk actions is a huge improvement to the user experience. The addition of the Gantt chart and analytics components provides valuable insights for users.
On the backend, the SQL migration for board tags is well-executed, focusing on performance and atomicity. The command palette is now much more robust, with better loading/error states and an error boundary.
The code quality is high, with good separation of concerns and use of modern React patterns. I've left a few suggestions for minor improvements, mostly around performance, robustness, and navigation consistency. Great work!
apps/db/supabase/migrations/20250623130150_improve_board_tags_performance_and_atomicity.sql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/tasks/boards/[boardId]/_components/list-view.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
🚨 Biome Check ReportIssues Found: 2774📊 Analysis Summary
🔍 Issue Breakdown
🛠️ Next StepsRun the following command to fix issues: bun format-and-lint:fixThen commit and push the changes.
🤖 Auto-generated by Biome Check workflow • Last updated: 6/25/2025, 4:31:04 AM
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx (1)
58-482: Consider adding test coverage for error scenarios.Static analysis indicates that most of the error handling and edge case code paths are not covered by tests. Given the critical nature of task creation, comprehensive test coverage would help ensure reliability.
Would you like me to help generate unit tests for the error handling scenarios, loading states, and validation logic?
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx (1)
220-220: Use client-side navigation instead of full page reload.Using
window.location.hrefcauses a jarring full page reload. Consider using Next.js router for smoother navigation.+import { useRouter } from 'next/navigation'; export function AddTaskForm({ // ... existing props }) { + const router = useRouter(); // ... existing code // In the retry button (line 220): - onClick={() => window.location.reload()} + onClick={() => refetch()} // In the create board button (line 248-249): - onClick={() => { - const wsId = window.location.pathname.split('/')[1]; - window.location.href = `/${wsId}/tasks/boards`; - }} + onClick={() => { + router.push(`/${wsId}/tasks/boards`); + setOpen(false); + }}Also applies to: 248-249
apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx (1)
60-64: Use client-side navigation instead of full page reload.Both navigation actions use
window.location.hrefwhich causes a full page reload. This was previously flagged - consider implementing client-side navigation.+import { useRouter } from 'next/navigation'; export function BoardNavigation({ wsId, setOpen }: BoardNavigationProps) { + const router = useRouter(); // ... existing code const handleBoardSelect = (boardId: string) => { - // Navigate to the board - window.location.href = `/${wsId}/tasks/boards/${boardId}`; - setOpen(false); + router.push(`/${wsId}/tasks/boards/${boardId}`); + setOpen(false); }; // In the create board button (line 150): - onClick={() => { - window.location.href = `/${wsId}/tasks/boards`; - setOpen(false); - }} + onClick={() => { + router.push(`/${wsId}/tasks/boards`); + setOpen(false); + }}Also applies to: 150-151
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/src/components/command/quick-actions.tsx (1)
45-65: Consider using Next.js router for navigationThe navigation handlers use
window.location.hrefwhich causes full page reloads. In a Next.js application, using the router would provide better performance and user experience.Consider importing and using Next.js router:
+import { useRouter } from 'next/navigation'; export function QuickActions({ wsId, setOpen, }: QuickActionsProps) { + const router = useRouter(); const [isExpanded, setIsExpanded] = useState(true); const handleAddTask = () => { - window.location.href = `/${wsId}/tasks/boards`; + router.push(`/${wsId}/tasks/boards`); setOpen(false); }; const handleTimeTracker = () => { - window.location.href = `/${wsId}/time-tracker`; + router.push(`/${wsId}/time-tracker`); setOpen(false); }; const handleCalendar = () => { - window.location.href = `/${wsId}/calendar`; + router.push(`/${wsId}/calendar`); setOpen(false); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx(10 hunks)apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/components/command/coming-soon.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/command/command-header.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/command/command-root.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/command/index.tsx(3 hunks)apps/web/src/components/command/quick-actions.tsx(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx (2)
apps/web/src/components/command/types.ts (1)
Board(1-5)packages/ui/src/components/ui/command.tsx (2)
CommandGroup(172-172)CommandItem(174-174)
apps/web/src/components/command/quick-actions.tsx (2)
packages/ui/src/components/ui/command.tsx (2)
CommandGroup(172-172)CommandItem(174-174)packages/ui/src/components/ui/calendar.tsx (1)
Calendar(211-211)
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx
[warning] 4-8: apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx#L4-L8
Added lines #L4 - L8 were not covered by tests
[warning] 20-20: apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests
apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx
[warning] 58-62: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L58-L62
Added lines #L58 - L62 were not covered by tests
[warning] 73-74: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L73-L74
Added lines #L73 - L74 were not covered by tests
[warning] 80-84: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L80-L84
Added lines #L80 - L84 were not covered by tests
[warning] 89-89: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L89
Added line #L89 was not covered by tests
[warning] 102-103: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L102-L103
Added lines #L102 - L103 were not covered by tests
[warning] 204-221: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L204-L221
Added lines #L204 - L221 were not covered by tests
[warning] 223-224: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L223-L224
Added lines #L223 - L224 were not covered by tests
[warning] 226-228: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L226-L228
Added lines #L226 - L228 were not covered by tests
[warning] 230-230: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L230
Added line #L230 was not covered by tests
[warning] 244-250: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L244-L250
Added lines #L244 - L250 were not covered by tests
[warning] 252-252: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L252
Added line #L252 was not covered by tests
[warning] 254-254: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L254
Added line #L254 was not covered by tests
[warning] 300-306: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L300-L306
Added lines #L300 - L306 were not covered by tests
[warning] 308-309: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L308-L309
Added lines #L308 - L309 were not covered by tests
[warning] 311-316: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L311-L316
Added lines #L311 - L316 were not covered by tests
[warning] 318-331: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L318-L331
Added lines #L318 - L331 were not covered by tests
[warning] 346-347: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L346-L347
Added lines #L346 - L347 were not covered by tests
[warning] 354-356: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L354-L356
Added lines #L354 - L356 were not covered by tests
[warning] 358-364: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L358-L364
Added lines #L358 - L364 were not covered by tests
[warning] 366-369: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L366-L369
Added lines #L366 - L369 were not covered by tests
[warning] 414-414: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L414
Added line #L414 was not covered by tests
[warning] 416-416: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L416
Added line #L416 was not covered by tests
[warning] 432-433: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L432-L433
Added lines #L432 - L433 were not covered by tests
[warning] 452-457: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L452-L457
Added lines #L452 - L457 were not covered by tests
[warning] 459-463: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L459-L463
Added lines #L459 - L463 were not covered by tests
[warning] 465-472: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L465-L472
Added lines #L465 - L472 were not covered by tests
[warning] 474-480: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L474-L480
Added lines #L474 - L480 were not covered by tests
[warning] 482-482: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L482
Added line #L482 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (16)
apps/web/src/components/command/command-header.tsx (1)
64-66: LGTM!The callback style change is functionally equivalent and aligns with the explicit callback pattern used elsewhere in the codebase.
apps/web/src/components/command/coming-soon.tsx (1)
9-76: Well-implemented collapsible UI pattern!The refactoring successfully introduces a collapsible interface that's consistent with the broader command palette UI improvements. The default collapsed state for "Coming Soon" features is a good UX choice.
apps/web/src/components/command/command-root.tsx (1)
20-40: Keyboard shortcuts implementation looks good!The implementation correctly handles Cmd/Ctrl+1 and Cmd/Ctrl+2 to toggle sections, with proper event cleanup.
apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx (2)
58-230: Excellent error handling implementation!The comprehensive error handling with retry logic, loading states, and user-friendly error messages significantly improves the user experience. The distinction between different error scenarios (loading failure, no boards, no lists) is particularly well done.
452-482: Clear and helpful validation messages!The validation feedback provides excellent guidance to users with appropriate icons and contextual messages for each scenario.
apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx (1)
28-161: Excellent implementation of self-contained data fetching!The component successfully manages its own data fetching with comprehensive error handling, retry logic, and clear UI states. The collapsible interface and limitation to 10 boards with an informative message are thoughtful UX improvements.
apps/web/src/components/command/quick-actions.tsx (5)
7-14: Good addition of collapsible UI componentsThe imports for chevron icons and Button component support the new collapsible functionality well.
23-26: Excellent refactoring of props interfaceThe simplified props interface with
wsIdandsetOpenaligns perfectly with the decentralized architecture approach mentioned in the PR objectives.
32-32: Good default state for user experienceDefaulting the collapsible section to expanded provides better initial user experience by showing available actions immediately.
68-90: Excellent implementation of collapsible headerThe collapsible header with action count badge and toggle button provides great user feedback and control. The styling and interaction patterns are well implemented.
93-215: Well-structured collapsible content with good visual designThe conditional rendering based on
isExpandedstate and the comprehensive styling for each action item create an excellent user experience. The hover effects, gradients, and responsive design elements are well-implemented.apps/web/src/components/command/index.tsx (5)
8-12: Good imports for error boundary functionalityThe new imports for Button, icons, and React support the comprehensive error boundary implementation.
26-38: Excellent error boundary reset mechanismThe key-based reset approach combined with comprehensive state cleanup provides a robust way to recover from errors while ensuring the component starts fresh.
40-41: Good architectural decision documentedThe comment clearly explains the shift from centralized to decentralized data fetching, which aligns with the PR objective to improve navigation and component modularity.
125-172: Excellent error boundary integrationThe error boundary wrapping the main UI components provides robust error isolation while maintaining the existing component structure and functionality.
177-247: Outstanding error boundary implementationThis error boundary implementation follows React best practices with:
- Proper error catching and logging
- User-friendly error UI with clear messaging
- Development-mode error details for debugging
- Multiple recovery options (retry and reload)
- Clean state management
The visual design with icons and spacing provides excellent user experience during error scenarios.
- Fix SQL migration exception handling to catch correct error type (raise_exception instead of SQLSTATE '22000') - Move priorityLabels constant outside component render to improve performance - Replace window.location.href with router.push() for client-side navigation in: - add-task-form.tsx - board-navigation.tsx - quick-actions.tsx - Add useRouter imports where needed for proper Next.js navigation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (4)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/tasks/boards/[boardId]/_components/list-view.tsx (1)
106-112: LGTM! Performance optimization successfully implemented.This change addresses the previous review feedback perfectly by moving the
priorityLabelsobject outside the component. This prevents unnecessary re-creation on every render and improves performance, especially as the priority list could grow.The constant is properly defined and maintains the correct mapping structure.
apps/db/supabase/migrations/20250623130150_improve_board_tags_performance_and_atomicity.sql (1)
70-70: Good fix addressing the previous review feedback.The change from
WHEN SQLSTATE '22000'toWHEN raise_exceptioncorrectly addresses the past review comment. This ensures that the exception handler catches the defaultRAISE EXCEPTIONerrors (P0001) thrown by thevalidate_and_normalize_board_tagsfunction, rather than trying to catch data_exception errors (22000) that aren't being raised.apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx (2)
91-91: Correct fix for query return type consistency.Returning
{ tasks: [] }instead of[]maintains consistency with the expected return type structure, preventing potential runtime errors when accessing.tasksproperty.
246-257: Good navigation improvement addressing previous feedback.The use of
router.push()instead ofwindow.location.hrefprovides smooth client-side navigation and properly closes the command palette. This addresses the previous review feedback effectively.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/tasks/boards/[boardId]/_components/list-view.tsx (1)
1209-1210: Consider implementing the bulk operations.There are TODO comments for bulk edit and delete functionality. These features would enhance the user experience for managing multiple tasks simultaneously.
Would you like me to help implement the bulk edit and delete operations, or should I open a new issue to track these tasks?
Also applies to: 1219-1220
apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx (1)
210-250: Optimize board list rendering and consider virtualization.The current implementation shows only the first 10 boards (
slice(0, 10)), which is good for performance. However, consider implementing virtualization for workspaces with many boards to improve performance further.The current approach is acceptable, but for better scalability:
- {boards.slice(0, 10).map((board: Board) => ( + {boards.map((board: Board) => (And implement a virtual scrolling solution like
react-windoworreact-virtualizedif performance becomes an issue with large board lists.apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx (1)
206-232: Comprehensive error handling with user-friendly interface.The error state implementation provides:
- Clear visual feedback with error icons
- Detailed error messaging
- Retry functionality via page reload
- Option to close the form
However, consider using query refetch instead of
window.location.reload()for better UX:- onClick={() => window.location.reload()} + onClick={() => window.location.reload()}Actually, you might want to implement a refetch mechanism similar to the BoardNavigation component for consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
apps/db/supabase/migrations/20250623130150_improve_board_tags_performance_and_atomicity.sql(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/tasks/boards/[boardId]/_components/list-view.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx(11 hunks)apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/components/command/quick-actions.tsx(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/web/src/components/command/quick-actions.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx (2)
apps/web/src/components/command/types.ts (1)
Board(1-5)packages/ui/src/components/ui/command.tsx (2)
CommandGroup(172-172)CommandItem(174-174)
apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx (1)
packages/ui/src/components/ui/select.tsx (5)
Select(170-170)SelectTrigger(178-178)SelectValue(179-179)SelectContent(171-171)SelectItem(173-173)
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/tasks/boards/[boardId]/_components/list-view.tsx
[warning] 106-112: apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/tasks/boards/[boardId]/_components/list-view.tsx#L106-L112
Added lines #L106 - L112 were not covered by tests
apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx
[warning] 27-27: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L27
Added line #L27 was not covered by tests
[warning] 57-57: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by tests
[warning] 60-64: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L60-L64
Added lines #L60 - L64 were not covered by tests
[warning] 75-76: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L75-L76
Added lines #L75 - L76 were not covered by tests
[warning] 82-86: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L82-L86
Added lines #L82 - L86 were not covered by tests
[warning] 91-91: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L91
Added line #L91 was not covered by tests
[warning] 104-105: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L104-L105
Added lines #L104 - L105 were not covered by tests
[warning] 206-223: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L206-L223
Added lines #L206 - L223 were not covered by tests
[warning] 225-226: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L225-L226
Added lines #L225 - L226 were not covered by tests
[warning] 228-230: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L228-L230
Added lines #L228 - L230 were not covered by tests
[warning] 232-232: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L232
Added line #L232 was not covered by tests
[warning] 246-252: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L246-L252
Added lines #L246 - L252 were not covered by tests
[warning] 254-254: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L254
Added line #L254 was not covered by tests
[warning] 256-256: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L256
Added line #L256 was not covered by tests
[warning] 302-308: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L302-L308
Added lines #L302 - L308 were not covered by tests
[warning] 310-311: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L310-L311
Added lines #L310 - L311 were not covered by tests
[warning] 313-318: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L313-L318
Added lines #L313 - L318 were not covered by tests
[warning] 320-333: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L320-L333
Added lines #L320 - L333 were not covered by tests
[warning] 348-349: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L348-L349
Added lines #L348 - L349 were not covered by tests
[warning] 356-358: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L356-L358
Added lines #L356 - L358 were not covered by tests
[warning] 360-366: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L360-L366
Added lines #L360 - L366 were not covered by tests
[warning] 368-371: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L368-L371
Added lines #L368 - L371 were not covered by tests
[warning] 416-416: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L416
Added line #L416 was not covered by tests
[warning] 418-418: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L418
Added line #L418 was not covered by tests
[warning] 434-435: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L434-L435
Added lines #L434 - L435 were not covered by tests
[warning] 454-459: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L454-L459
Added lines #L454 - L459 were not covered by tests
[warning] 461-465: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L461-L465
Added lines #L461 - L465 were not covered by tests
[warning] 467-474: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L467-L474
Added lines #L467 - L474 were not covered by tests
[warning] 476-482: apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx#L476-L482
Added lines #L476 - L482 were not covered by tests
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
- GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
- GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
- GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
- GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
- GitHub Check: Verify generated types
🔇 Additional comments (12)
apps/web/src/components/command/board-navigation.tsx (5)
32-48: Excellent data fetching implementation with robust error handling.The useQuery implementation is well-structured with appropriate retry logic and error handling. The retry configuration (2 attempts with 1000ms delay) provides good user experience without being overly aggressive.
67-71: Good client-side navigation implementation.Using
router.push()for navigation is the correct approach for Next.js applications, providing smooth client-side transitions without full page reloads. The component properly closes the command palette after navigation.
74-95: Comprehensive loading state with good UX.The loading state provides clear visual feedback with both header and content loading indicators. The consistent use of the
Loadercomponent with appropriate styling enhances the user experience.
98-135: Excellent error handling with user-friendly retry mechanism.The error state implementation is comprehensive, providing:
- Clear error messaging with visual indicators
- Detailed error information from the caught exception
- Accessible retry functionality
- Consistent styling with the loading state
138-176: Well-designed empty state with clear call-to-action.The empty state effectively guides users with:
- Clear messaging about the lack of boards
- Helpful instructions for next steps
- Accessible button to create the first board
- Consistent visual design patterns
apps/web/src/components/command/add-task-form.tsx (7)
27-27: Good addition of useRouter for proper navigation.Adding
useRouterenables client-side navigation, which is the correct approach for Next.js applications instead of usingwindow.location.href.
60-77: Excellent error handling enhancement for boards query.The addition of
boardsErrorand retry configuration (lines 75-76) significantly improves the robustness of the component. The retry logic provides good user experience during temporary network issues.
82-106: Good improvement to tasks query error handling.The enhanced error handling for tasks loading and the retry configuration improve component reliability.
302-334: Excellent UX improvement for boards without lists.The conditional rendering provides clear feedback when a board has no lists, with appropriate warning styling and helpful instructions. The fallback to the select dropdown when lists are available maintains the expected workflow.
348-372: Good error handling for tasks loading.The addition of error state handling for tasks provides consistent error feedback throughout the component. The visual indicators and error messages help users understand what went wrong.
434-435: Smart button disable logic for empty lists.The additional disable condition
(Boolean(selectedBoardId) && availableLists.length === 0)prevents task creation when the selected board has no lists, which is the correct behavior.
453-484: Comprehensive validation messaging enhances UX.The validation messages provide clear, contextual feedback for different validation states:
- Missing task name
- Missing board selection
- Missing list selection
- Board with no lists
The use of consistent icons and styling creates a cohesive user experience.
- Add refetch function to boards query in add-task-form - Replace window.location.reload() with refetchBoards() in error handling - Provides better user experience without full page reload
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes